Dependency and Relationships

How fractured agency turns connection into pressure and why relationships stall

---

This page is part of a larger explanation of my worldview and how it shapes the way I understand people, relationships, and change, and informs how I coach men around marriage, mission, and fatherhood, and any person around faith

---

This page explores how dependency forms beneath the surface of relationships and why it so often turns connection into pressure rather than safety.

Most relational conflict is not caused by a lack of communication skills or effort. It emerges when people attempt to source stability, worth, or regulation from one another because internal agency has been compromised.

Dependency does not mean people are needy or weak. It means a relationship has been tasked with carrying weight it was never designed to hold.

Dependency as a Survival Strategy

In my work, dependency refers to an internal orientation, not a relational preference.

It develops when a person no longer trusts themselves to regulate emotion, meaning, or safety internally. The nervous system adapts by reaching outward for relief.

At first, dependency feels like connection. Over time, it becomes pressure. The relationship is quietly assigned the job of making someone feel okay.

Most people did not choose this pattern consciously. It formed because it worked when other options felt unavailable.

Enmeshment and the Loss of Boundaries

When dependency becomes mutual or prolonged, enmeshment often follows.

Enmeshment occurs when emotional boundaries blur and two people begin operating as a single regulatory unit. Feelings, interpretations, and reactions become entangled.

Disagreement feels dangerous. Independence feels like abandonment. Individual agency erodes in the name of closeness.

What looks like intimacy on the surface often masks fear underneath.

The Drama Triangle Pattern

One of the most common expressions of relational dependency is the drama triangle.

In this pattern, people unconsciously rotate through victim, rescuer, and persecutor roles as a way to manage insecurity and regain a sense of control.

These roles are not identities. They are strategies. Each one attempts to relieve internal pressure by externalizing it.

The triangle persists not because people enjoy it, but because it provides temporary relief without addressing the underlying fracture.

Relational Gridlock

When dependency, enmeshment, and drama patterns persist, relationships enter gridlock.

Progress stalls. Conversations repeat. Small issues trigger outsized reactions. Both people feel misunderstood and unheard.

Gridlock is not a failure of love. It is a sign that the system has lost movement because agency has been outsourced.

No amount of negotiation resolves gridlock without restoring individual stability.

How This Shows Up in Marriage

In marriage, dependency often shows up as walking on eggshells, chronic tension, or emotional shutdown.

Men may feel responsible for their partner’s emotional state, yet resentful of the burden. Others feel perpetually inadequate, as though nothing they do is enough.

Conflict becomes cyclical. Resolution feels temporary. Intimacy fades because connection feels conditional rather than safe.

Both partners may quietly fear that standing firmly in themselves will cost the relationship.

How This Shows Up in Mission

In mission or work, dependency often expresses itself through external validation.

Men may chase approval, success, or recognition to feel secure, or avoid committing fully out of fear of being exposed or failing.

Feedback feels personal. Setbacks feel destabilizing. Work becomes a referendum on worth rather than an expression of purpose.

Over time, motivation erodes and meaning thins, even when outcomes look successful.

How This Shows Up in Fatherhood

In fatherhood, dependency often appears as over-functioning or disengagement.

Some fathers attempt to control outcomes to manage their own anxiety. Others withdraw, unsure how to lead without becoming authoritarian.

Children sense this tension and adapt around it, often learning to regulate the system themselves.

What is lost is relaxed presence, where guidance flows from steadiness rather than fear.

How This Shows Up in Faith and Deconstruction

In faith, dependency often takes the form of outsourcing authority.

Some people cling tightly to leaders, doctrines, or communities to avoid internal uncertainty. Others reject all structure after feeling controlled or betrayed.

Deconstruction becomes reactive rather than integrative, driven by the need to escape pressure rather than build trust.

Faith either collapses or hardens when it is asked to carry what only internal agency can support.

The Natural Next Question

If this resonates, a common response is, “I can see this pattern, but I don’t know how to get out of it without damaging my relationships.”

That uncertainty is understandable. Dependency patterns are not resolved by asserting independence or forcing change in others.

This site exists to articulate my perspective and help you understand what may be operating beneath the surface of your experience. Understanding creates orientation, but it does not automatically produce transformation.

If you want to move beyond recognition into lived change, there are structured ways to engage this work more deeply. Those paths are outlined below.